, , , ,

We have developed a culture whereby individuals can say, “that offends me,” and the law of the land springs into action and spends our hard-earned money harassing someone for wearing a cross!
The thing is, the ‘clot’ remains anonymous whilst the victim of the clot has to face a barrage from the media…Does this sound fair to you?
Offended clots should be made known to the public and have to face the media barrage they have put their victim through. We’d soon see a sharp decrease in such idiotic episodes.
If it were down to me, I’d make the clot pay their own legal bill too. Why should we, the taxpayers, have to foot the bill for some prat who is offended by a cross hanging on a chain around someone’s neck?
Let’s remove the anonymity and see who’s got the guts.